JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU
26
MAY 1949 SARDAR PATEL
Here a proposal was brought
forward by one friend from Madras, for reservation and for communal
electorates. Now when the separate communal electorate motion was moved, it was
supported by the great Muslim leader, who swore loyalty to the Constitution in this
House and immediately after packed off to Karachi
Those who claim that in this country
there are two nations and that there is nothing common between the two, and
"that we must have our homeland where we can breather freely", let
them do so. I do not blame them. But those who still have that idea that they
have worked of it, that they have got it and therefore they should follow the
same path here, to them I respectfully appeal to go and enjoy the fruits of
that freedom and to leave us in peace. There is no place here for those who
claim separate representation. Separate representation, when it was introduced
in this unfortunate country, was introduced not by the demand of those who
claim to have made those demands, but as Maulana Muhammad Ali once said, it was
a "command performance" that has fulfilled its task and we have all
enjoyed the fruits of it. Let us now for the first time have a change of
chapter in the history of this country and have a "consent
performance". I want the consent of this House and the consent of all the
minorities to change of chapter in the history. You have the privilege and the
honour to do it. The future generation will record in golden letters the
performance that you are doing today I hope the trust that the step that we are
taking today is the step which will change the face, the history and the
character of our country.
That conception in your mind which has
worked for many years must be washed off altogether. Here we are a free
country: have we are a sovereign State: here we are a sovereign Assemble: here
we are moulding our future according to our own free will. Therefore, please
forget the past: try to forget it. If it is impossible, then the best place is
where your thoughts and ideas suit you.
I remember that the gentleman who
moved the motion here last time, in August 1947, when asking for separate
electorates, I believe, said that the Muslims today were a very strong,
well-knit and well-organised minority. Very good. A minority that could force
the partition of the country is not a minority at all. Why do you think that
you are a minority? If you are a strong, well-knit and well-organised minority,
why do you want to claim safeguards, why do you want to claim privileges? It
was all right when there was a third party: but that is all over. That dream is
a mad dream and it should be forgotten altogether. Never think about that, do
not imagine that anybody will come here to hold the scales and manipulate them
continuously. All that is gone.
Why should not Mr. Nagappa who today
challenges the Brahmin be so? I am glad to hear that the ownership of 20 acres
of land does not entitle him to be a scheduled casts man. "That is my
privilege" he said " because I am born a scheduled caste man. You
have first to be born in the scheduled caste". It gladdened my heart
immensely that that young man had the courage to come before the House and
claim the privilege of being born in the Scheduled Caste. It is not a
dishonour: he has an honourable place in this country. I want every scheduled
caste man to feel that he is superior to a Brahmin or rather, let us say, I
want every scheduled caste man and the Brahmin to forget that he is a scheduled
caste man or a Brahmin respectively and that they are all equal and the same.
But there are some people who worked
for separation, who claimed all throughout their lives that the two nations are
different and yet claim to represent here the remaining "nation". I
am surprised that Mr. Saadulla claims to represent the vast masses of Muslims
in this country now. How can he? I am amazed that he makes the claim
The future shape of this country as a
free country is different from the future that was contemplated by those who
worked for partition. Therefore I would ask those who have worked for that to
note that the times have changed, the circumstances have changed and the world
has changed and that therefore they must change if they want salvation. Now I
need not waste any time on the question of separate electorates.
But when Mr. Lari says that we must
introduce the system of proportional. I must tell him that it is not anything
new. Its origin was in Ireland and it is now in vogue in Switzerland and some
other countries. I may point out to Mr. Lari that Ireland is not equal to one
district of the United Provinces. Gorakhpur district alone is bigger then Ireland.
Ours is a vast country with masses of people. We have introduced adult
franchise here where there is so much illiteracy. Therefore even this simple
system of direct vote is frightening. That being so, it is not easy to
introduce complications of this nature. In this Constitution to introduce such
complications is very dangerous. Therefore, if he is satisfied that reservation
is bad then let him not try to bring it back by the backdoor. Leave it as it
is. Trust us and see what happens. A month ago at the election to the Ahmedabad
municipality I noticed that all the Muslims contested jointly under the system
of joint electorates and, although they were opposed by people financed by the
League, everyone of them got in and the Scheduled Castes got one more seat then
their quota. Free and unfettered election has proved that any kind of
impediment by say of reservation or other things is bad for us. If we leave the
thing to be settled by the majority and the minority among them-selves they
will do so and it will bring credit to all. Why are you afraid? Yesterday you
were saying, you are a big minority well organised. Why are you afraid? Make
friends with others and create a change in the atmosphere. You will then get
more then your quota, if you really feel for the country in the same manner as
the other people. New I do not think so far as the Muslim case is concerned,
there is any other point remaining to be answered. Most of the able
representatives of the Muslim community here have exposed the claims made by
the other representatives. I need not therefore say more about this.
Now the other case is that of the Sikhs. I
have always held the Sikh community with considerable respect, regard and
admiration. I have been their friend even though sometimes they disclaimed me.
On this occasion also i did advise them that if they insisted I sill give it to
them and induce the Committee to agree. But I do feel that this is not in their
interests. It is for them to decide. I leave it to them. to ask for this
concession for the Scheduled Caste Sikhs does not reflect credit on the Sikh
community. They quoted Ranjit Singh who gave such help to the Scheduled Castes.
What empire did they hold, the Scheduled Castes? They have been the most
down-trodden people, absolute dust with the dust. What is their position today
in spite of all our tall talk?
That is what the Scheduled Castes
are. They are not people who keep kirpans. They are a different lot. But to
keep a kirpan or a sword and to entertain fear is inconsistent. This may react
detrimentally to your cause. I do not grudge this concession to the Sikhs. I
will ask the Sikhs to take control of the country and rule. They may be able to
rule because they have got the capacity, they have got the resources and they
have got the courage. In any field, either in agriculture, in engineering or in
the army, in any walk of life you have proved your mettle. Why do you being to
think low of yourself? That is why I am asking the Scheduled Caste people also
to forget that they are Scheduled Castes. Although it is difficult for them to
forget it, it is not difficult for the Sikhs to do so. Therefore, when you
acknowledge with gratefulness the concession that we have given, I am grateful
to you. In this country we want the atmosphere of peace and harmony now, not of
suspicion but of trust. We want to grow. India today is suffering from want of
blood. It is completely anaemic.
Unless you put blood into its veins, even
if we quarrel about concessions of reservation, we will get nothing. We have to
build up this country on solid foundations. As I told you, I was trembling on
the day I was appointed as Chairman of this Committee but I felt proud and
today also I feel proud-and I hope the House will feel proud--that we are able
to bring about almost unanimity in removing the past blots in our Constitution
(hear, hear) and to lay, with the grace of God and with the blessings of the
Almighty, the foundations of a true secular democratic State, where everybody
has equal chance. Let God give us the wisdom and the courage to do the right
thing to all manner of people. (Cheers).
Comments
Post a Comment