Test

  AKBAR   WAZIR AND   SENAPATI WERE MOSTLY FOREIGNER MUSLIM   ONLY 15 PERCENT WERE   HINDU AND HISTORY CHANDRA BHAN BRAHMAN RAJPUT NEVER MOUNT GUARD IN MUGHAL FORTRESS LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA   BY   K S Lal Page 136 137 The administration of the Sultanate and Mughal Empire was bureaucratic throughout. Over long periods this administrative system was dominated by immigrants from abroad, mainly West Asia and North Africa and this gave it much of the character of foreign and Islamic rule. Commenting on the list of mansabdars in the Ain-i-Akbari, Moreland says that while about 70 percent of the nobles were foreigners belonging to families which had either come to India with Humayun or had arrived at the court after the accession of Akbar, of the remaining 30 percent of the appointments which were held by Indians, rather more than half were Moslems and rather less than half Hindus.176 This high proportion of Muslim mansabdars belonging to familie...

  MUALIM MADE JAT SLAVES INITIALLY JAT HELPED KASIM AND POPULATION OF BSINDH WAS MAINLY BAUDH This article is  chiefly  based on legacy of muslim rule in india by one of the  most respected historian of India    K S LAL LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA   BY   K S LAL Page 79 Iconoclasm and razing other peoples temples is central to Islam; it derives its justification from the Quranic revelations and the Prophets Sunnah or practice. Muhammad had himself destroyed temples in Arabia and so set an example for his followers. In return the mujahid (or fighter of Jihad) is promised handsome reward in this world as well as in the world to come. Without Jihad there is no Islam. Jihad is a religious duty of every Muslim. It inspired Muslim invaders and rulers to do deeds of valour, of horror and of terror. Their chroniclers wrote about the achievements of the heroes of Islam with zeal and glee, often in the very language they had learnt from their scrip...

  HINDU PARTICULARLY RAJPUT RESISTANCE AGAINST MUSLIM TYRANNY AURANGJEB   ORFDER FOR   DESTRUCTION OF TEMPLE MAHARAJA RAJSINGH OF MEWAR GAVE   SHELTER TO MATHURA TEMPLE IDOL WITHOUT FEAR OF AURAGJEB     ILTUTMISH THREATENED HINDU ACCEPT ISLAM   OR DIE PROTEST OF HINDUS PARTICULARLY RAJPUTS AGAINST TEMPLE DESTRUCTIONS This article is  chiefly  based on legacy of muslim rule in india by one of the  most respected historian of India    K S LAL   Legacy of muslim rule in india by K S Lal Page 206 to 208 Aurangzebs policy of religious persecution of Hindus, in particular his destruction of temples, evoked universal Hindu discontent. It was an OLd practice, commencing from Muhammad bin Qasims invasion of Sind,55 to destroy temples during wars and in times of peace and convert them into mosques, and was continued throughout the medieval period. Aurangzeb also did the same in course of his wars in Bihar, Kuch Bihar et...

  Halala of sultan wife LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA   BY   K S Lal Page 181 The Shaikhs used to marry in high families and possessed a clout which sometimes became a problem for Sultans. A sixteenth century Suhrawardi writer says148 that Shaikh Sadruddin Arif had married a divorced wife of Prince Muhammad, the eldest son of Balban. The circumstances of this marriage are given as follows: The prince divorced his wife, whom he passionately loved, in a fit of fury. When he recovered his normal state of mind, he felt deeply pained for what he had done. Legally he could not take her back into his harem unless she was married to someone else and then divorced by him. A man of genuine piety was searched to restore the broken relationship. Shaikh Arif, the most outstanding saint of the town, promised to marry the princess and divorce her the next day. But, after the marriage, he refused to divorce her on the ground that the princess herself was not prepared to be divorced....

  WHEN AURANJEB ORDERED   NO HINDU CAN   RIDE HORSE BUT DUE TO SEVERE   PROTEST OF RAJPUTS AND MARATHA AURANJEB   WAS FORCED TO GIVE ORDER THAT   RAJPUT AND MARATHA CAN RIDE HORSE BUT NO ANY OTHER CASTE CAN RIDE IT AURANJEB TRAMPLED HINDUS WHO PROTESTED JAZIA ON FOOT OF ELEPHANT LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA   BY   K S Lal Page 203 to 204 The protest of the Brahmans did succeed in getting some concessions from the King. He fixed their Jiziyah at a low rate although in status they belonged to the upper class. Secondly, he permitted other Hindus (shopkeepers and traders) to pay the tax on their behalf. But Aurangzeb (1658-1707) was more adamant because he himself knew the law well. His imposition of the Jiziyah provoked repeated protests. On the publication of this order (reimposing the Jiziyah) by Aurangzeb in 1679, writes Khafi Khan, the Hindus all round Delhi assembled in vast numbers under the jharokha of the Emperor to represent their in...

  FOREIGN MUSLIM SULTANS CAPTURED ALL CASTES HINDU WOMEN MADE THEM SEX SLAVES   DESTROYED TEMPLES ,KILLED CIVILIAN HINDUS, AND MADE HINDU CHILDREN SLAVES AND SOLD HINDU SLAVES IN DIFFERENT MUSLIM MARKETS   AND DID FORCEFULL CONVERSION           This article is  chiefly  based on legacy of muslim rule in india by one of the  most respected historian of India    K S LAL You will find some numbers in this article actually that is references which detail is in the end of book   ISLAM IDEOLOGY WHICH COMMANDS TO BREAK IDOLS AND CAPTURING KAFIR GIRLS AND MAKING SLAVES P ROFIT MOHAMMAD HAD HIMSELF DESTROYED TEMPLE AND IDOLS LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA   BY   K S Lal page 78 In Surah (Chapter) 2, ayat (injunction) 193, the Quran says, Fight against them (the mushriks) until idolatry is no more, and Allahs religion reigns supreme. The command is repeated in Surah 8, ayat 39. In Surah 69, ayats 303...