पीढ़ियों से आरक्षण किसके पास

 



पीढ़ियों से आरक्षण किसके पास?

गहना बनाने का आरक्षण-- सुनार

हथियार बनाने का आरक्षण-- लोहार

पत्तल बनाने का आरक्षण -- बारी

सूप बनाने का आरक्षण-- धरिकार

नाव चलाने का आरक्षण- मल्लाह

बर्तन बनाने का आरक्षण -- ठठेरा

 कपड़े सिलने का आरक्षण - - दर्जी

फनीचर बनाने का आरक्षण --बढ़ई

बाल काटने का आरक्षण-- नाइ

 ईट बनाने का आरक्षण--प्रजापति

मूर्ति बनाने का आरक्षण-- शिल्पकार

घर  बनाने का आरक्षण -- राजमिस्त्री

तेल पेरने का आरक्षण--तेली

पान बेचने का आरक्षण-- बरई

दूध बेचने का आरक्षण- ग्वाला

 मांस बेचने का आरक्षण --खटिक

जूता बनाने का आरक्षण - चर्मकार

माला बनाने का आरक्षण -- माली

मिठाई  बनाने का आरक्षण --हलवाई

 क्या  हजार साल से किसी सुनार ने लोहार को दामाद बनाकर उसको अपने आरक्षित ब्यवसाय में घुसने दिया

आखिर फिर आरक्षण का असली आनन्द कौन  लिया?

जब  हजारो साल इन्ही पेशे से रोजगार लिया किसी को घुसने नही दिया  तो आज इस पेशे के कारण खुद को पछड़ा क्यो कहते हो ?

विचार करिये ?

सनातन धर्म जब सरकारी नौकरी नही होती  थी तब सबको रोजगार दिया फिर अन्याय कहा?

भारत को सोने की चिड़िया बनाने वाले पछड़े कैसे?

क्षत्रियो का आरक्षण  क्या था--जवानी में बलिदान होकर औरतो का विधवा होना बच्चो का अनाथ होना

फिर ये  ब्यवसाय अगड़ा कैसे?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

yadav jat maratha kurmi kunbi ahir wife of mugal and muslims they also gave daughter to mugals muslims for marriage

Image
 BEFORE  NAARATING THIS SEE HOW SOME PEOPLES HAVING BLUE TICK ARE MAKING DEROGATORY REMARKS ABOUT RAJPUTS THEY ARE PRPOGATING  AS THAT RAJPUT HAD LOST ALL  WARS AGAINST MUSLIMS SEE THE TWEET OF SANJEEV BHATT  A  COMMUNIST WEB SITE SROLL  IN OWNED  BY A MAHARASTRIAN samir  PATIL is repeately making propganda as rajputs were not brave they saved their state by giving daughters to muslim in another words he is propagating as rajputs were dauters givers and only some maratha were brave see repeated article by scrool of sandip patil before narrative fact that almost  all martial caste  of india had given daughters to muslims for marriage see this blog in which 103  battles had been given from 690 to 1750  [1000 year ] in which rajput had badly defeated muslims  so the in india we are 80 percent hindu whereas persia iran irak siria and others 50 countris were forced to be muslim within 100 year of islamik conquest but only ...
Read more

MUGAL HAREM

 e = a = > ° x < a = < % 2 = History of the Khaljis, 1950, 1967, 1980 Twilight of the Sultanate, 1963, 1980 ‘Studies in Medieval Indian History, 1966 Studies in Asian History (Edited), 1969 Growth of Muslim Population in Medieval India, 1973 Early Muslims in India, 1984 The Mughal Harem First Published 1988 46) @KSLALcm-) .) 34) 968 PRICE Rs. 800 ISBN : 81-85179-03-4 Published by Aditya Prakashan, 4829/1, Prahlad Lane, 24, Ansari Road, New Delhi-110002 on ‘behalf of the Contre for Resoarch and Training in History, Archacology and Palaeo-environment, ‘New Delhi and Printed at Indraprastha Press (C.B.T.), Nehru House, New Preface In the present work Mughal harem means the harem of the Mughal emperor, the seraglios of royal princes and important nobles, but primarily the harem of the King, By King is meant all the Mughal emperors from Babur to Bahadur Shah Zafar, but in particular Akbar and his three successors—Jahangir, Shahjahan and ‘Aurangzeb. Akbar gave the Mughal harem a...
Read more

reservation is not right any govt is free to not give sc st obc or any type of reservation

  Reservation is not a fundamental right says Supreme Court see an article in hindu paper february  11 2020 Reservation as right: on Supreme Court judgment      It is quite understandable that a recent  Supreme Court judgment  , that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Articl...
Read more