BEFORE NAARATING THIS SEE HOW SOME PEOPLES HAVING BLUE TICK ARE MAKING DEROGATORY REMARKS ABOUT RAJPUTS THEY ARE PRPOGATING AS THAT RAJPUT HAD LOST ALL WARS AGAINST MUSLIMS SEE THE TWEET OF SANJEEV BHATT A COMMUNIST WEB SITE SROLL IN OWNED BY A MAHARASTRIAN samir PATIL is repeately making propganda as rajputs were not brave they saved their state by giving daughters to muslim in another words he is propagating as rajputs were dauters givers and only some maratha were brave see repeated article by scrool of sandip patil before narrative fact that almost all martial caste of india had given daughters to muslims for marriage see this blog in which 103 battles had been given from 690 to 1750 [1000 year ] in which rajput had badly defeated muslims so the in india we are 80 percent hindu whereas persia iran irak siria and others 50 countris were forced to be muslim within 100 year of islamik conquest but only ...
e = a = > ° x < a = < % 2 = History of the Khaljis, 1950, 1967, 1980 Twilight of the Sultanate, 1963, 1980 ‘Studies in Medieval Indian History, 1966 Studies in Asian History (Edited), 1969 Growth of Muslim Population in Medieval India, 1973 Early Muslims in India, 1984 The Mughal Harem First Published 1988 46) @KSLALcm-) .) 34) 968 PRICE Rs. 800 ISBN : 81-85179-03-4 Published by Aditya Prakashan, 4829/1, Prahlad Lane, 24, Ansari Road, New Delhi-110002 on ‘behalf of the Contre for Resoarch and Training in History, Archacology and Palaeo-environment, ‘New Delhi and Printed at Indraprastha Press (C.B.T.), Nehru House, New Preface In the present work Mughal harem means the harem of the Mughal emperor, the seraglios of royal princes and important nobles, but primarily the harem of the King, By King is meant all the Mughal emperors from Babur to Bahadur Shah Zafar, but in particular Akbar and his three successors—Jahangir, Shahjahan and ‘Aurangzeb. Akbar gave the Mughal harem a...
Reservation is not a fundamental right says Supreme Court see an article in hindu paper february 11 2020 Reservation as right: on Supreme Court judgment It is quite understandable that a recent Supreme Court judgment , that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Articl...
Comments
Post a Comment