seaparate eloctorate is devisive
Sardar patel was totally
against demand of separate electorate by muslim leage and ambedkar he told this
demand as poison
Sardar
patel on 27 august 1947
The introduction of the
system of communal electorates is a poison which has entered into the body
politic of our country. Many Englishmen who were responsible for this also
admitted that. But today, after agreeing to the separation of the country as a
result of this communal electorate, I never thought that that proposition was
going to be moved seriously, and even if it was moved seriously, that it would
be taken seriously.and it was thrown out by a large majority
Patel on 28 august 1947
To the Scheduled
Caste friends, I also appeal: "Let us forget what Dr. Ambedkar or Ms group
have done. Let us forget what you did. You have very nearly escaped partition
of the country again on your lines. You have seen the
result of separate electorates in Bombay, that when the greatest benefactor of
your community came to Bombay to stay in bhangi quarters it was your people who
tried to stone his quarters. What was it ? It was again the result of this
poison, and therefore I resist this only because I feel that the vast majority
of the Hindu population wish you well.. Without them where will you he ?
Therefore, secure their confidence and forget that you are a Scheduled Caste. I
do not understand how Mr. Khandekar is a Scheduled Caste man. If
he and I were to go outside India, nobody will find out whether he is a
Scheduled Caste man or I am a Scheduled Caste man. There is no Scheduled
Caste between us. So those representatives of the Scheduled Caste must know
that the Scheduled Caste has to be effaced altogether from our society, and if
it is to be effaced, those who have ceased to be untouchables and sit amongst
us have to forget that they are untouchables or else if they carry this
inferiority complex, they will not be able to serve their community. They will
only be able to serve their community by feeling now that they are with us
They are no more Scheduled Castes and therefore they must change their manners
and I appeal to them also to have no breach between them and the other group of
Scheduled Castes. There are groups amongst themselves, but everyone
tries according to his own light. We are now to begin again. So let us forget
these sections and cross-sections and let us stand as one, and together
HE CONEMNED MUSLIM members FOR
DEMANDING SEPARATE ELECTORATE again AND REPRIManded that they have
already taken Pakistan so don’t play their tactice again that they are
affectionate junior brothers and hindu should give them separate electorate to
win our affection he advised him to accept the change situation
28 august 1947 sardar patel
So far as the amendment moved by the
representative of the Muslim League is concerned, I find that I was mistaken in
my Impression.
and if I had believed this, 1,would certainly
not have agreed to any reservation at all. (Hear, Hear). When I agreed to the
reservation an the population basis, I thought that our friends of the Muslim
League will see the reasonableness of our attitude and allow themselves to
accommodate themselves to the changed conditions after the separation of the
country. But I now find them adopting the same methods which were adopted when
the separate electorates were first introduced in this country, and in spite of
ample sweetness in the language used there is a full dose of poison in the
method adopted. (Hear, Hear). Therefore,I regret to say that if I lose the
affection of the younger brother, I am prepared to lose it because the method
he wants to adopt would bring about his death. I would rather lose his
affection and keep him alive. If this amendment is lost, we will lose the
affection of the younger brother, but I prefer the younger brother to live so
that he may see the wisdom of the attitude of the elder brother and he may
still learn to have affection for the elder brother
Therefore, my friends, you must change your attitude, adapt yourself to the changed conditions. And don't pretend to say "Oh, our affection is very great for you". We have seen your affection. Why talk of it ? Let us forget the affection. Let us face the realities. Ask yourself whether you really want to stand here and cooperate with us or you want again to play disruptive tactics. Therefore when I appeal to you, I appeal to you to have a change in your heart, not a change in the tongue, because that won't pay here. Therefore, I still appeal to you : "Friends, reconsider your attitude and withdraw your amendment". Why go on saying "Oh, Muslims were not heard; Muslim amendment was not carried". If that is going to pay you, you are much mistaken, and I know how it cost me to protect the Muslim minorities here under the present condition and in the present atmosphere. Therefore, I suggest that you don't forget that the days in which the agitation of the type you carried on are closed and we begin a new chapter. Therefore, I once more appeal to you to forget the past. Forget what has happened. You have got what you wanted. You have got a separate State and remember, you are the people who were responsible for it, and not those who remain in Pakistan. You led the agitation. You got.it. What is it that you want now ? I don't understand. In the majority Hindu provinces YOU, the minorities, you led the agitation. You got the partition and now again you tell me and ask me to say for the purpose of Securing the affection of the younger brother that I must agree to the same thing again, to divide the country again in the divided part. For God's sake, understand that we have also got some sense. Let us understand the thing clearly. Therefore when I say we must forget the past, I say it sincerely. There will be no injustice done to you. There will be generosity towards you, but there must be reciprocity. If it is absent, then you take it from me that no soft words can conceal what is behind your words. Therefore, I plainly once more appeal to you strongly that let us forget and let us be one
nation.
26 MAY 1949 SARDAR PATEL
26
MAY 1949 SARDAR PATEL
Here a proposal was brought
forward by one friend from Madras, for reservation and for communal
electorates. Now when the separate communal electorate motion was moved, it was
supported by the great Muslim leader, who swore loyalty to the Constitution in this
House and immediately after packed off to Karachi
Those who claim that in this country
there are two nations and that there is nothing common between the two, and
"that we must have our homeland where we can breather freely", let
them do so. I do not blame them. But those who still have that idea that they
have worked of it, that they have got it and therefore they should follow the
same path here, to them I respectfully appeal to go and enjoy the fruits of
that freedom and to leave us in peace. There is no place here for those who
claim separate representation. Separate representation, when it was introduced
in this unfortunate country, was introduced not by the demand of those who
claim to have made those demands, but as Maulana Muhammad Ali once said, it was
a "command performance" that has fulfilled its task and we have all
enjoyed the fruits of it. Let us now for the first time have a change of
chapter in the history of this country and have a "consent
performance". I want the consent of this House and the consent of all the
minorities to change of chapter in the history. You have the privilege and the
honour to do it. The future generation will record in golden letters the
performance that you are doing today I hope the trust that the step that we are
taking today is the step which will change the face, the history and the
character of our country.
That conception in your mind which has
worked for many years must be washed off altogether. Here we are a free
country: have we are a sovereign State: here we are a sovereign Assemble: here
we are moulding our future according to our own free will. Therefore, please
forget the past: try to forget it. If it is impossible, then the best place is
where your thoughts and ideas suit you.
I remember that the gentleman who
moved the motion here last time, in August 1947, when asking for separate
electorates, I believe, said that the Muslims today were a very strong,
well-knit and well-organised minority. Very good. A minority that could force
the partition of the country is not a minority at all. Why do you think that
you are a minority? If you are a strong, well-knit and well-organised minority,
why do you want to claim safeguards, why do you want to claim privileges? It
was all right when there was a third party: but that is all over. That dream is
a mad dream and it should be forgotten altogether. Never think about that, do
not imagine that anybody will come here to hold the scales and manipulate them
continuously. All that is gone.
Why should not Mr. Nagappa who today
challenges the Brahmin be so? I am glad to hear that the ownership of 20 acres
of land does not entitle him to be a scheduled casts man. "That is my
privilege" he said " because I am born a scheduled caste man. You
have first to be born in the scheduled caste". It gladdened my heart
immensely that that young man had the courage to come before the House and
claim the privilege of being born in the Scheduled Caste. It is not a
dishonour: he has an honourable place in this country. I want every scheduled
caste man to feel that he is superior to a Brahmin or rather, let us say, I
want every scheduled caste man and the Brahmin to forget that he is a scheduled
caste man or a Brahmin respectively and that they are all equal and the same.
But there are some people who worked
for separation, who claimed all throughout their lives that the two nations are
different and yet claim to represent here the remaining "nation". I
am surprised that Mr. Saadulla claims to represent the vast masses of Muslims
in this country now. How can he? I am amazed that he makes the claim
The future shape of this country as a
free country is different from the future that was contemplated by those who
worked for partition. Therefore I would ask those who have worked for that to
note that the times have changed, the circumstances have changed and the world
has changed and that therefore they must change if they want salvation. Now I
need not waste any time on the question of separate electorates.
But when Mr. Lari says that we must
introduce the system of proportional. I must tell him that it is not anything
new. Its origin was in Ireland and it is now in vogue in Switzerland and some
other countries. I may point out to Mr. Lari that Ireland is not equal to one
district of the United Provinces. Gorakhpur district alone is bigger then Ireland.
Ours is a vast country with masses of people. We have introduced adult
franchise here where there is so much illiteracy. Therefore even this simple
system of direct vote is frightening. That being so, it is not easy to
introduce complications of this nature. In this Constitution to introduce such
complications is very dangerous. Therefore, if he is satisfied that reservation
is bad then let him not try to bring it back by the backdoor. Leave it as it
is. Trust us and see what happens. A month ago at the election to the Ahmedabad
municipality I noticed that all the Muslims contested jointly under the system
of joint electorates and, although they were opposed by people financed by the
League, everyone of them got in and the Scheduled Castes got one more seat then
their quota. Free and unfettered election has proved that any kind of
impediment by say of reservation or other things is bad for us. If we leave the
thing to be settled by the majority and the minority among them-selves they
will do so and it will bring credit to all. Why are you afraid? Yesterday you
were saying, you are a big minority well organised. Why are you afraid? Make
friends with others and create a change in the atmosphere. You will then get
more then your quota, if you really feel for the country in the same manner as
the other people. New I do not think so far as the Muslim case is concerned,
there is any other point remaining to be answered. Most of the able
representatives of the Muslim community here have exposed the claims made by
the other representatives. I need not therefore say more about this.
Now the other case is that of the Sikhs. I
have always held the Sikh community with considerable respect, regard and
admiration. I have been their friend even though sometimes they disclaimed me.
On this occasion also i did advise them that if they insisted I sill give it to
them and induce the Committee to agree. But I do feel that this is not in their
interests. It is for them to decide. I leave it to them. to ask for this
concession for the Scheduled Caste Sikhs does not reflect credit on the Sikh
community. They quoted Ranjit Singh who gave such help to the Scheduled Castes.
What empire did they hold, the Scheduled Castes? They have been the most
down-trodden people, absolute dust with the dust. What is their position today
in spite of all our tall talk?
That is what the Scheduled Castes
are. They are not people who keep kirpans. They are a different lot. But to
keep a kirpan or a sword and to entertain fear is inconsistent. This may react
detrimentally to your cause. I do not grudge this concession to the Sikhs. I
will ask the Sikhs to take control of the country and rule. They may be able to
rule because they have got the capacity, they have got the resources and they
have got the courage. In any field, either in agriculture, in engineering or in
the army, in any walk of life you have proved your mettle. Why do you being to
think low of yourself? That is why I am asking the Scheduled Caste people also
to forget that they are Scheduled Castes. Although it is difficult for them to
forget it, it is not difficult for the Sikhs to do so. Therefore, when you
acknowledge with gratefulness the concession that we have given, I am grateful
to you. In this country we want the atmosphere of peace and harmony now, not of
suspicion but of trust. We want to grow. India today is suffering from want of
blood. It is completely anaemic.
Unless you put blood into its veins, even
if we quarrel about concessions of reservation, we will get nothing. We have to
build up this country on solid foundations. As I told you, I was trembling on
the day I was appointed as Chairman of this Committee but I felt proud and
today also I feel proud-and I hope the House will feel proud--that we are able
to bring about almost unanimity in removing the past blots in our Constitution
(hear, hear) and to lay, with the grace of God and with the blessings of the
Almighty, the foundations of a true secular democratic State, where everybody
has equal chance. Let God give us the wisdom and the courage to do the right
thing to all manner of people. (Cheers).
26 may 1949
The Honourable Sardar Vallabhbhai J. Patel (Bombay: General):Sir, when I was first appointed Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Minorities, I really trembling and I took up the jobs with a heavy heart, because I felt the task was immensely difficult, owing to the history of the past so many years of foreign rule.
There was a difference of opinion from some progressive nationalist-minded leaders, such as Dr. Mookherjee who from the beginning opposed any kind of reservation or safeguards. I am sure he will be happy today to find that his ambition is being fulfilled.
Here a proposal was brought forward by one friend from Madras, for reservation and for communal electorates. Now when the separate communal electorate motion was moved, it was supported by the great Muslim leader, who swore loyalty to the Constitution in this House and immediately after packed off to Karachi. He is now carrying on the work of the Muslim League on that side. He has left a legacy here-a residuary legacy perhaps in Madras. Unfortunately, there is still a very large amount of funds belonging to the old Muslim League, which was the All-India Muslim League, which has yet to be settled, and some of our friends still claim that they might get some big chunk of those funds if they still persist in continuing the old League here.
Those who claim that in this country there are two nations and that there is nothing common between the two, and "that we must have our homeland where we can breather freely", let them do so. I do not blame them. But those who still have that idea that they have worked of it, that they have got it and therefore they should follow the same path here, to them I respectfully appeal to go and enjoy the fruits of that freedom and to leave us in peace. There is no place here for those who claim separate representation
Comments
Post a Comment