PUNISHMENT TO BRAHMAN FOR WORSHOPING HIND GOD AND BURNING HIM BY MUSLIM SULTAN

 

PUNISHMENT TO BRAHMAN  FOR WORSHOPING HIND GOD AND   BURNING HIM BY MUSLIM  SULTAN

LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA  BY  K S LalPage 20

A report was brought to the Sultan (Firoz Tughlaq 1351-88) that there was in Delhi an old Brahman (Zunar dar) who persisted in publicly performing the worship of idols in his house; and that the people of the city, both Musalmans and Hindus, used to resort to his house to worship the idol. This Brahman had constructed a wooden tablet (muhrak), which was covered within and without with paintings of demons and other objects. On days appointed, the infidels went to his house and worshipped the idol, without the fact becoming known to the public officers. The Sultan was informed that this Brahman had perverted Muhammadan women, and had led them to become infidels. (These women were surely newly converted and had not been able to completely cut themselves off from their original faith). An order was accordingly given that the Brahman, with his tablet, should be brought in the presence of the Sultan at Firozabad. The judges, doctors, and elders and lawyers were summoned, and the case of the Brahman was submitted for their opinion. Their reply was that the provisions of the Law were clear: the Brahman must either become a Musalman or be burned. The true faith was declared to the Brahman, and the right course pointed out, but he refused to accept it. Orders were given for raising a pile of faggots before the door of the darbar. The Brahman was tied hand and foot and cast into it; the tablet was thrown on the top and the pile was lighted. The writer of this book (Shams Siraj Afif) was present at the darbar and witnessed the execution the wood was dry, and the fire first reached his feet, and drew from him a cry, but the flames quickly enveloped his head and consumed him. Behold the Sultans strict adherence to law and rectitude, how he would not deviate in the least from its decrees.39

OTHER INSTANCES OF BRAHMAN KILLING

LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA  BY  K S LalPage 21

During the reign of Firoz himself the Hindu governor of Uchch was killed. He was falsely accused of expressing affirmation in Islam and then recanting.40 In the time of Sikandar Lodi (1489-1517) a Brahman of Kaner in Sambhal was similarly punished with death for committing the crime of declaring as much as that Islam was true, but his own religion was also true.41

MURDER OF RAJPUTS AND BRAHMANS WHEN THEY CAME AGAIN IN HINDU FAITH

LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA  BY  K S Lalpage 21

During the reign of Firoz himself the Hindu governor of Uchch was killed. He was falsely accused of expressing affirmation in Islam and then recanting.40 In the time of Sikandar Lodi (1489-1517) a Brahman of Kaner in Sambhal was similarly punished with death for committing the crime of declaring as much as that Islam was true, but his own religion was also true.41

LEGACY OF MUSLIM RULE IN INDIA  BY  K S Lal page 46

As an example, the language of some contemporary chroniclers may be quoted as samples. Nawasa Shah was a scion of the Hindu Shahiya dynasty and was converted to Islam by Mahmud of Ghazni. Such conversions were common. But return to ones original religion was considered apostasy punishable with death. Al Utbi, the author of Tarikh-i-Yamini, writes how Sultan Mahmud punished Nawasa Shah: Satan had got the better of Nawasa Shah, for he was again apostatizing towards the pit of plural worship, and had thrown off the slough of Islam, and held conversation with the chiefs of idolatry respecting the casting off the firm rope of religion from his neck. So the Sultan went swifter than the wind in that direction, and made the sword reek with the blood of his enemies. He turned Nawasa Shah out of his government, took possession of all the treasures which he had accumulated, re-assumed the government, and then cut down the harvest of idolatry with the sickle of his sword and spear. After God had granted him this and the previous victory, which were tried witnesses as to his exalted state and proselytism, he returned without difficulty to Ghazna

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

rajput victory on mugal राजपूतो की मुस्लिमो पर जीत 1

Image
source of this article भारत के सबसे प्रसिद्ध इतिहासकार डॉ राम गोपाल मिश्रा जी ने अपनी किताब indian resistance to muslim invasion में इन सभी युद्ध का वर्णन किया है यह किताब अमेज़न पर और सब जगह उपलब्ध है आप गूगल सर्च करिए मिल जाएगी      अगर  बहन बेटियों की शादी से किसी का राज बच जाता तो  पाकिस्तान अफगानिस्तान बांग्लादेश ईरान इराक सीरिया अफगानिस्तान  तुर्किस्तान जैसे और 50 देशों के भी धर्म और राज बच गए होते  क्योंकि जब क़ासिम ने राजा दाहिर को हराया तो उनकी बेटियों पर भी कब्जा किया राज भी छीन लिया यही हाल यही हाल अलाउद्दिन गजनवी सब ने किया आज अगर हम अभी भी हिन्दू है तो इसका कारण ये है राजपूतों की मुगलों मुस्लिम मुसलमानों पर  जीत 636 सबसे पहला आक्रमण अरबोने समुद्र के रास्ते से मुंबई के नजदीक थाना में किया जिसमें उनकी बुरी तरीके से हार हुई 640 में खलीफा उमर ने समुद्र के  रास्ते से सिंध पर विशाल सेना भेजी लेकिन उनके कमांडर mugraiah को सिंध के ब्राम्हण राजा ने मार डाला खलीफा उमर की भारत के अलावा कही भी हार नहीं हुई थी इस हार से पूरा मुस्लिम जगत सुन्न...
Read more

yadav jat maratha kurmi kunbi ahir wife of mugal and muslims they also gave daughter to mugals muslims for marriage

Image
 BEFORE  NAARATING THIS SEE HOW SOME PEOPLES HAVING BLUE TICK ARE MAKING DEROGATORY REMARKS ABOUT RAJPUTS THEY ARE PRPOGATING  AS THAT RAJPUT HAD LOST ALL  WARS AGAINST MUSLIMS SEE THE TWEET OF SANJEEV BHATT  A  COMMUNIST WEB SITE SROLL  IN OWNED  BY A MAHARASTRIAN samir  PATIL is repeately making propganda as rajputs were not brave they saved their state by giving daughters to muslim in another words he is propagating as rajputs were dauters givers and only some maratha were brave see repeated article by scrool of sandip patil before narrative fact that almost  all martial caste  of india had given daughters to muslims for marriage see this blog in which 103  battles had been given from 690 to 1750  [1000 year ] in which rajput had badly defeated muslims  so the in india we are 80 percent hindu whereas persia iran irak siria and others 50 countris were forced to be muslim within 100 year of islamik conquest but only ...
Read more

reservation is not right any govt is free to not give sc st obc or any type of reservation

  Reservation is not a fundamental right says Supreme Court see an article in hindu paper february  11 2020 Reservation as right: on Supreme Court judgment      It is quite understandable that a recent  Supreme Court judgment  , that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Articl...
Read more